tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5951639121853262790.post2921085317687499957..comments2023-11-15T20:27:34.038-06:00Comments on Bubble of Sanity: Constitutional AtrophyBruce Parsonshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01836035281793854900noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5951639121853262790.post-32651477796851598692009-04-25T11:55:00.000-06:002009-04-25T11:55:00.000-06:00Roe v. Wade has a basis of an "Implied Right to Pr...Roe v. Wade has a basis of an "Implied Right to Privacy based on the Constitution."<br /><br />The Constitution has a "Stated Right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness."<br /><br />A stated, mandatory, required right to life would be a clear point to say that regardless of when life starts ,regardless of personal opinion or morals, it is unconstitutional to deny anyone a chance at these three "Inalienable rights." So why do we bicker on morals (perceptions)and implications of perceived thought instead of on the stated fact?<br /><br />I have yet to see anyone argue the standpoint of "Right to Life."LiquidFoxnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5951639121853262790.post-34518100027616811772009-04-22T15:01:00.000-06:002009-04-22T15:01:00.000-06:00Too bad the folks in congress don't read your blog...Too bad the folks in congress don't read your blog....maybe if you emailed it to them???<br />Meanwhile, I really like the last sentence. Wonder just how the federal government would handle secession this time around, since their attitude toward the military is that they are unnecessary.tamrionbooksnoreply@blogger.com